<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Authenticating Emails with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.kjctech.net/authentic-emails-with-spf-dkim-and-dmarc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.kjctech.net/authentic-emails-with-spf-dkim-and-dmarc/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=authentic-emails-with-spf-dkim-and-dmarc</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:22:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kent Chen		</title>
		<link>https://www.kjctech.net/authentic-emails-with-spf-dkim-and-dmarc/comment-page-1/#comment-199356</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Chen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 16:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.kjctech.net/?p=4288#comment-199356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kjctech.net/authentic-emails-with-spf-dkim-and-dmarc/comment-page-1/#comment-199354&quot;&gt;Dave T&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, Dave for pointing it out. I should&#039;ve also mentioned that most mail servers like Office 365 and G Suite have a default DKIM with both public and private keys set up for your domain. DMARC doesn&#039;t require both but you are right, they do two different things and it&#039;s better having both implemented.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.kjctech.net/authentic-emails-with-spf-dkim-and-dmarc/comment-page-1/#comment-199354">Dave T</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Dave for pointing it out. I should&#8217;ve also mentioned that most mail servers like Office 365 and G Suite have a default DKIM with both public and private keys set up for your domain. DMARC doesn&#8217;t require both but you are right, they do two different things and it&#8217;s better having both implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave T		</title>
		<link>https://www.kjctech.net/authentic-emails-with-spf-dkim-and-dmarc/comment-page-1/#comment-199354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 16:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.kjctech.net/?p=4288#comment-199354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#062;You don’t need to implement both SPF and DKIM. Utilizing either one of them should be good enough.

This is completely wrong.  They do completely different things.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;You don’t need to implement both SPF and DKIM. Utilizing either one of them should be good enough.</p>
<p>This is completely wrong.  They do completely different things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
